E-hailing passenger hurt: who's at fault
You were hurt as a passenger in an e-hailing car and do not know who to claim from.
An e-hailing passenger injured in a crash can generally claim against whichever driver was actually at fault, whether that is the e-hailing driver or another vehicle involved, since a passenger is treated as a third party who did not cause the collision. Whether the e-hailing driver held the correct permit is a separate regulatory question and does not by itself decide who was negligent. See who is at fault in a crash for how this test applies generally.
The typical facts in this scenario
You are a fare-paying passenger in an e-hailing vehicle when it collides with another vehicle, or the e-hailing driver alone loses control. The trip is usually recorded in the app, which most other crash types do not have.
How fault is usually assessed
Fault is worked out the same way as any other crash: by looking at how each driver actually drove, not at licensing or permit questions. The e-hailing driver can be found at fault, the other vehicle can be found at fault, or responsibility can be shared between them, depending entirely on the facts.
The evidence that decides this dispute
- The app’s own trip record, including the route, timestamps, and GPS trail.
- Dashcam footage, which many e-hailing drivers already run for their own protection.
- The police report and sketch plan for the collision itself.
- Witnesses, including any other passengers who may have been in either vehicle.
- The driver’s own account submitted through the e-hailing platform after the trip.
Save a screenshot of the trip details from the app immediately, since this record can be harder to retrieve later.[3] The police report after an accident explains what else to gather.
Who you can claim against as a passenger
As a passenger, you are generally treated as a third party, and compulsory motor insurance is required to cover a third party’s death or bodily injury regardless of which driver is found at fault.[2] A third-party bodily injury claim explains how this works in practice.
Contributory negligence for a passenger
If a rear seatbelt was available and you chose not to wear it, that can still reduce your own compensation, separately from who caused the crash.[1] Contributory negligence explained sets out how this is weighed.
What to do at the scene and after
Keep the trip active in the app if possible, get medical treatment, and photograph the scene while both vehicles are still there. Passenger injury claims explained and a road accident claim cover the process from there.
Common questions
Does it matter if the e-hailing driver did not have the right permit?
Not for deciding fault in the crash itself. A permit or licensing issue is a separate regulatory matter and does not by itself prove who was negligent in causing the collision.
Can I claim if the crash was caused by the other car, not my e-hailing driver?
Yes. As a passenger you are generally treated as a third party who can claim against whichever driver was actually at fault, without needing to be in the vehicle that caused the crash.
Is the app's trip record actually useful as evidence?
Yes, often more than people expect. The route, timestamps, and GPS trail can help establish speed, location, and timing that support the rest of your evidence.
What if I was not wearing a seatbelt in the back seat?
That can still reduce your own compensation if a seatbelt was available and not used, separately from who caused the crash.[1] [Contributory negligence explained](/contributory-negligence/) explains how that is weighed.
Sources
- Civil Law Act 1956, s.12 (Attorney General's Chambers) (accessed 2026-09-22)
- Road Transport Act 1987, s.91 (Ministry of Transport) (accessed 2026-09-22)
- Road Transport Act 1987, s.52 (Ministry of Transport) (accessed 2026-09-22)