Unlicensed driver: who is at fault

You found out the other driver had no licence and are not sure if that changes anything.

Finding out the other driver had no valid licence does not by itself decide who caused your crash. The Court of Appeal has ruled that a missing licence, road tax, or insurance is a separate offence under road transport law. It is punishable on its own, and does not itself prove negligence in how the accident happened.[1] See who is at fault in a crash for how fault is actually worked out.

The typical facts in this scenario

You are involved in a crash and later learn, often from the police report, that the other driver held no valid licence. Sometimes they were riding or driving a class of vehicle their licence did not cover. The natural assumption is that this makes them automatically at fault, but that is not how Malaysian law treats it.

How fault is actually assessed

The crash is still assessed on ordinary negligence: what each driver did, and whether that was careless. The licence issue is dealt with separately, through the criminal offence of driving without a valid licence. That offence does not automatically decide the civil question of fault.[1]

In practice, an unlicensed driver is often also the one who drove carelessly. That has to be shown through the actual driving, though, not assumed from the licence status alone.

The evidence that still decides this crash

  • The same evidence as any other crash: dashcam footage, the police report and sketch plan, and witnesses.
  • The specific manner of driving that led to the collision, not just the licence status.
  • Whether the driver’s actual conduct, such as speed or lane position, was careless.

Dashcam, photo and video evidence and the police report after an accident explain how to build this evidence properly.

Who pays you even so

Malaysian law generally restricts an insurer from refusing to pay a valid third-party claim for death or bodily injury simply because the driver had no valid licence.[2] This is an important protection for an innocent victim. It means the licence problem is mainly the other driver’s problem, not yours.

Claiming when the other driver is uninsured covers the related situation where there was no insurance at all. That is a separate question from the licence issue.

What to do at the scene and after

Report the accident within 24 hours regardless of what you learn about the other driver’s licence.[3] Let the facts of the driving itself, not the paperwork, guide your claim. A road accident claim covers the steps from there.

If the other driver had no licence, tell us what happened in the crash itself, and we will give you a plain view of how it looks.

Common questions

Does the other driver having no licence prove they were at fault?

No, not by itself. A missing licence is a separate offence under road transport law, and the Court of Appeal has confirmed it does not decide who was negligent in the crash itself.[1] Fault still depends on how each person actually drove.

Will the insurer refuse to pay because the driver had no licence?

Generally no. Malaysian law restricts an insurer from avoiding a valid third-party injury claim on that basis alone.[2] Your claim is not automatically defeated by the other driver's licence problem.

What if the vehicle also turns out to be uninsured?

That is a separate issue from the licence question, and it changes who actually pays you. [Claiming when the other driver is uninsured](/uninsured-driver-claim/) explains the different route that applies then.

Should I mention the licence issue in my police report?

Yes, record everything you observe or learn, since it forms part of the full picture even though it does not decide fault on its own. The police report is still central evidence either way.

If the other driver had no licence, tell us what happened in the crash itself, and we will give you a plain view of how it looks.

WhatsApp us